gallery, hawaiian noni, rheumatoid, hawaii art, dc comic books, hilo hattie, fatty post , sf, real plump , discussion forum, pets: product information, amsterdam tips travel guide pictures, webshots, vegitarian, plump granny , fat bottom girls , apricot exfoliating scrub, plump jack squaw valley inn , club cohiba, plump pussy , plump belly ,
|
In the news there are all those latest health findings on what's good for you and what's bad for you: drink this amount of wine weekly, eat this, avoid that, get this amount of amy sedaris interviews exercise, etc etc. When first hearing the latest health finding, do you in part judge the scientific validity of the amy sedaris interviews report based on how it relates to your lifestyle? If you love red meat are you more likely to accept on its amy sedaris interviews face value a report claiming the benefits of red meat and dismiss the report claiming that red meat should removed form one's diet? When an important medical report is given to the public on television, do you in part judge the validity of the report based on what the doctor is wearing and from where he is presenting the findings? Even if the report is the same, would you give more credence if the doctor is wearing a white lab coat and stethoscope and speaking from a laboratory (test tubes, vials, scientific charts in the background), as opposed to if he is wearing jeans and a well worn T-shirt and speaking from a park bench?
|